<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Genome Integrity - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Genome Integrity</description>
        <dc:date>2010-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/3" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/8">
        <title>Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in human gamma-delta and alpha-beta T-lymphocytes analysed by the alkaline comet assay</title>
        <description>It has been shown by a number of authors that the radiosensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) is higher in cancer patients compared to healthy donors, which is interpreted as a sign of genomic instability. PBMC are composed of different cell subpopulations which are differently radiosensitive and the difference between cancer patients and healthy donors could also be due to different composition of their PBMC pools. Gamma-delta T-lymphocytes play an important role in immunosurveillance and are promising cells for immunotherapy. Their abundance is frequently reduced in cancer patients so should their sensitivity to radiation be lower than that of other T-lymphocytes, this could, at least partly explain the low radiosensitivity of PBMC from healthy individuals compared to cancer patients. The present investigation was carried out to test this. Using the alkaline comet assay we analysed the level of DNA damage and repair in isolated &#947;&#948; T-lymphocytes, pan T-lymphocytes and in total PBMC exposed in vitro to gamma radiation. We found no difference in the level of DNA damage and the capacity of DNA repair between the T cell populations. This is the first study that addresses the question of sensitivity to radiation of gamma-delta T-cells.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Halina Lisowska</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marta Deperas-Kaminska</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Siamak Haghdoost</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingela Parmryd</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrzej Wojcik</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/7">
        <title>Uhrf1 is a genome caretaker that facilitates the DNA damage response to gamma-irradiation</title>
        <description>Background:
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by ionizing radiation or by the stalling of DNA replication forks are among the most deleterious forms of DNA damage. The ability of cells to recognize and repair DSBs requires post-translational modifications to histones and other proteins that facilitate access to lesions in compacted chromatin, however our understanding of these processes remains incomplete. UHRF1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that has previously been linked to events that regulate chromatin remodeling and epigenetic maintenance. Previous studies have demonstrated that loss of UHRF1 increases the sensitivity of cells to DNA damage however the role of UHRF1 in this response is unclear.
Results:
We demonstrate that UHRF1 plays a critical role for facilitating the response to DSB damage caused by &#947;-irradiation. UHRF1-depleted cells exhibit increased sensitivity to &#947;-irradiation, suggesting a compromised cellular response to DSBs. UHRF1-depleted cells show impaired cell cycle arrest and an impaired accumulation of histone H2AX phosphorylation (&#947;H2AX) in response to &#947;-irradiation compared to control cells. We also demonstrate that UHRF1 is required for genome integrity, in that UHRF1-depleted cells displayed an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations compared to control cells.
Conclusions:
Our findings indicate a critical role for UHRF1 in maintenance of chromosome integrity and an optimal response to DSB damage.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Helena Mistry</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Tamblyn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hussein Butt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Sisgoreo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aileen Gracias</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meghan Larin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kalpana Gopalakrishnan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manoor Prakash Hande</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Peter McPherson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/9">
        <title>Low levels of ATM in breast cancer patients with clinical radiosensitivity</title>
        <description>Background and PurposeAdjuvant radiotherapy for cancer can result in severe adverse side effects for normal tissues. In this respect, individuals with anomalies of the ATM (ataxia telangiectasia) protein/gene are of particular interest as they may be at risk of both breast cancer and clinical radiosensitivity. The association of specific ATM gene mutations with these pathologies has been well documented, however, there is uncertainty regarding pathological thresholds for the ATM protein.
Results:
Semi-quantitative immuno-blotting provided a reliable and reproducible method to compare levels of the ATM protein for a rare cohort of 20 cancer patients selected on the basis of their severe adverse normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy. We found that 4/12 (33%) of the breast cancer patients with severe adverse normal tissue reactions following radiotherapy had ATM protein levels &lt; 55% compared to the mean for non-reactor controls.
Conclusions:
ATM mutations are generally considered low risk alleles for breast cancer and clinical radiosensitivity. From results reported here we propose a tentative ATM protein threshold of ~55% for high-risk of clinical radiosensitivity for breast cancer patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Zhiming Fang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sergei Kozlov</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael McKay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rick Woods</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Geoff Birrel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carl Sprung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dedee Murrell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kiran Wangoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Linda Teng</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Kearsley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Lavin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Graham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raymond Clarke</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-06-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/4">
        <title>Requirement of ATM-dependent pathway for the repair of a subset of DNA double strand breaks created by restriction endonucleases</title>
        <description>Background:
DNA double strand breaks induced by DNA damaging agents, such ionizing radiation, are repaired by multiple DNA repair pathways including non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair and homologous recombination (HR) repair. ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint regulates a part of DNA repair pathways, however, the exact role of ATM activity remains to be elucidated. In order to define the molecular structure of DNA double strand breaks requiring ATM activity we examined repair of DNA double strand breaks induced by different restriction endonucleases in normal human diploid cells treated with or without ATM-specific inhibitor.
Results:
Synchronized G1 cells were treated with various restriction endonucleases. DNA double strand breaks were detected by the foci of phosphorylated ATM at serine 1981 and 53BP1. DNA damage was detectable 2 hours after the treatment, and the number of foci decreased thereafter. Repair of the 3&apos;-protruding ends created by Pst I and Sph I was efficient irrespective of ATM function, whereas the repair of a part of the blunt ends caused by Pvu II and Rsa I, and 5&apos;-protruding ends created by Eco RI and Bam HI, respectively, were compromised by ATM inhibition.
Conclusions:
Our results indicate that ATM-dependent pathway plays a pivotal role in the repair of a subset of DNA double strand breaks with specific end structures.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Keiji Suzuki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maiko Takahashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasuyoshi Oka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Motohiro Yamauchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masatoshi Suzuki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shunichi Yamashita</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Localization of an hTERT repressor region on human chromosome 3p21.3 using chromosome engineering</title>
        <description>Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that synthesizes telomeric DNA. The reactivation of telomerase activity by aberrant upregulation/expression of its catalytic subunit hTERT is a major pathway in human tumorigenesis. However, regulatory mechanisms that control hTERT expression are largely unknown. Previously, we and others have demonstrated that the introduction of human chromosome 3, via microcell-mediated chromosome transfer (MMCT), repressed transcription of the hTERT gene. These results suggested that human chromosome 3 contains a regulatory factor(s) involved in the repression of hTERT. To further localize this putative hTERT repressor(s), we have developed a unique experimental approach by introducing various truncated chromosome 3 regions produced by a novel chromosomal engineering technology into the renal cell carcinoma cell line (RCC23 cells). These cells autonomously express ectopic hTERT (exohTERT) promoted by a retroviral LTR promoter in order to permit cellular division after repression of endogenous hTERT. We found a telomerase repressor region located within a 7-Mb interval on chromosome 3p21.3. These results provide important information regarding hTERT regulation and a unique method to identify hTERT repressor elements.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Satoshi Abe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiromi Tanaka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomomi Notsu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shin-ichi Horike</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chikako Fujisaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dong-Lai Qi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Takahito Ohhira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Gilley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mitsuo Oshimura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroyuki Kugoh</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>Inhibition of poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase-1 in telomerase deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts increases arsenite-induced genome instability</title>
        <description>Background:
The telomerase enzyme is a viable target for anti-cancer therapy given the innate differences in telomerase activity between tumour cells and normal somatic cells. However, the time lag between telomerase inhibition and telomeres becoming critically short to trigger cell death, allows cancer cells to acquire drug resistance. Inhibition of DNA repair pathways along with telomerase could be an alternative strategy to enhance anti-tumour effects and circumvent the possibility of drug resistance. Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1), an important DNA damage sensor and a DNA repair factor, has important roles in maintaining telomeres and chromosomal stability. In this study, the effects of combined inhibition of PARP-1 and telomerase in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) following sodium arsenite exposure (a carcinogen and potent DNA damaging agent), were evaluated.
Results:
Inhibition of PARP in telomerase deficient MEFs induced an increase in arsenite-induced DNA damage as compared to control cells. Combined inhibition also resulted in enhanced genomic instability, demonstrated by elevated micronuclei induction and chromosomal aberrations with decreased cell survival. In addition, telomerase inhibition in PARP-1 deficient MEFs led to greater telomere shortening and increased genomic instability.
Conclusions:
Our study demonstrated that the co-inhibition of PARP-1 and telomerase in MEFs rendered cells more susceptible to DNA damaging agents. Hence, these results offer support for the use of combined inhibition of PARP-1 and telomerase as a strategy to minimise the problems associated with long-term telomerase inhibition in cancer therapeutics.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Resham Gurung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lakshmidevi Balakrishnan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rabindra Bhattacharjee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jayapal Manikandan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Srividya Swaminathan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M.  Prakash Hande</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>Eukaryotic gene invasion by a bacterial mobile insertion sequence element IS2 during cloning into a plasmid vector</title>
        <description>Escherichia coli (E. coli) are commonly used as hosts for DNA cloning and sequencing. Upon transformation of E. coli with recombined vector carrying a gene of interest, the bacteria multiply the gene of interest while maintaining the integrity of its content. During the subcloning of a mouse genomic fragment into a plasmid vector, we noticed that the size of the insert increased significantly upon replication in E. coli. The sequence of the insert was determined and found to contain a novel DNA sequence within the mouse genomic insert. A BLAST search of GenBank revealed the novel sequence to be that of the Insertion Sequence 2 (IS2) element from E. coli that was likely inserted during replication in that organism. Importantly, a detailed search of GenBank shows that the IS2 is present within many eukaryotic nucleotide sequences, and in many cases, has been annotated as being part of the protein. The results of this study suggest that one must perform additional careful analysis of the sequence results using BLAST comparisons, and further verification of gene annotation before submission into the GenBank.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Alireza Senejani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joann Sweasy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/1">
        <title>Genome Integrity - a new open access journal</title>
        <description>No description available</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Razqallah Hakem</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Prakash Hande</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Petrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Predrag Slijepcevic</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/3">
        <title>Defective Artemis causes mild telomere dysfunction</title>
        <description>Background:
Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) requires several proteins including Ku, DNA-PKcs, Artemis, XRCC4, Ligase IV and XLF. Two of these proteins, namely Ku and DNA-PKcs, are also involved in maintenance of telomeres, chromosome end-structures. In contrast, cells defective in Ligase IV and XRCC4 do not show changes in telomere length or function suggesting that these proteins are not involved in telomere maintenance. Since a mouse study indicated that defective Artemis may cause telomere dysfunction we investigated the effects of defective Artemis on telomere maintenance in human cells.
Results:
We observed significantly elevated frequencies of telomeric fusions in two primary fibroblast cell lines established from Artemis defective patients relative to the control cell line. The frequencies of telomeric fusions increased after exposure of Artemis defective cells to ionizing radiation. Furthermore, we observed increased incidence of DNA damage at telomeres in Artemis defective cells that underwent more than 32 population doublings using the TIF (Telomere dysfunction Induced Foci) assay. We have also inhibited the expression levels of DNA-PKcs in Artemis defective cell lines by either using synthetic inhibitor (IC86621) or RNAi and observed their greater sensitivity to telomere dysfunction relative to control cells.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that defective Artemis causes a mild telomere dysfunction phenotype in human cell lines.</description>
        <link>http://www.genomeintegrity.com/content/1/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Hemad Yasaei</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Predrag Slijepcevic</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Genome Integrity 2010, 1:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/2041-9414-1-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Integrity</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>2041-9414</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-05-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
